President Donald Trump<\/strong> entered the opening days of U.S. strikes on Iran facing a net negative approval picture and mixed public support for military escalation. While the administration has argued the operation was necessary to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, critics dispute the threat assessment and question the legal and political basis for action. Early polling suggests the strikes are controversial across the electorate, with the economy and cost of living still dominating voter priorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Polling averages cited in the report show Trump\u2019s approval rating has stayed underwater since the spring of his first year back in office. One aggregate listed 43.3%<\/strong> approval and 54.5%<\/strong> disapproval as of March 2<\/strong>. It also cited a low point of 42%<\/strong> approval on Feb. 17<\/strong>, described as his worst net reading in that measure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Another aggregator cited 41%<\/strong> approval and 56%<\/strong> disapproval as of March 2<\/strong>, with a lowest approval reading of 40%<\/strong> first reached on Feb. 12<\/strong>. It also cited a highest disapproval reading of 57%<\/strong> on March 1<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A survey conducted shortly after the strikes found 27%<\/strong> of respondents approved of the operation that killed Iran\u2019s leader Ali Khamenei<\/strong>. In the same poll, 43%<\/strong> said they disapproved, while 29%<\/strong> said they were unsure. The survey also found 56%<\/strong> believed Trump is too willing to use military force to advance U.S. interests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Within that poll, skepticism varied by party identification. The view that Trump is too willing to use force was held by 87%<\/strong> of Democrats, 23%<\/strong> of Republicans, and 60%<\/strong> of respondents who identified with neither party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The administration has defended the strikes as necessary because Iran was described as being close to developing a nuclear weapon and ballistic missiles capable of reaching the United States. However, the report says national security analysts and Iran experts questioned those claims, arguing they rely on assumptions they consider wrong or exaggerated. Politically, the operation has triggered criticism from Democrats who say Trump should have sought congressional approval, and it has also produced pushback from some high-profile voices in the president\u2019s broader political coalition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The report notes polling over recent months suggesting voters want the White House to focus on the economy and the cost of living. That backdrop increases the political risk of a prolonged conflict, particularly if it raises energy costs, disrupts markets, or adds inflation pressure. The administration has framed the operation as lasting several weeks, which means the public response may evolve as casualties, costs, and outcomes become clearer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Polling taken in the weeks leading up to the Feb. 28 strikes showed that public attitudes shifted depending on how questions were framed. One survey conducted the day before the strikes found 51%<\/strong> favored U.S. military action to stop Iran from making nuclear weapons. Yet, when asked about overall approach, respondents leaned toward non-military options, with 38%<\/strong> preferring diplomacy and 22%<\/strong> preferring sanctions. Only 18%<\/strong> supported removing Iran\u2019s leadership by force, while 22%<\/strong> preferred no engagement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Other surveys cited in the report showed broad concern about Iran\u2019s nuclear program but limited trust in Trump\u2019s judgment on military force abroad. In one poll, 56%<\/strong> said they trusted him only a little or not at all on the use of military force outside the United States, and 55%<\/strong> expressed similarly low trust in how he deals with adversarial nations. Another cited figure said only 27%<\/strong> of Americans, and 14%<\/strong> of independents, trusted him to make the right choices on using military force abroad.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump is entering a potentially multi-week Iran operation with approval ratings already net negative and early polling showing limited public backing for the strikes. While some Americans support action framed as preventing a nuclear weapon, broader surveys suggest many prefer diplomacy or sanctions and have low trust in Trump\u2019s handling of military force. With the economy still the top voter concern, the political impact is likely to depend on whether the conflict remains short and contained or develops into a longer, costlier escalation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Introduction President Donald Trump entered the opening days of U.S. strikes on Iran facing a net negative approval picture and mixed public support for military escalation. While the administration has argued the operation was necessary to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, critics dispute the threat assessment and question the legal and<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":4455,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[303,301,310,304,308,309,302,307,306,305],"ppma_author":[44],"class_list":{"0":"post-4451","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-politics","8":"tag-congressional-approval-debate","9":"tag-cost-of-living-voters","10":"tag-iran-nuclear-threat-claims","11":"tag-iran-strikes-polling","12":"tag-midterm-election-risk","13":"tag-military-force-trust","14":"tag-new-york-times-polling-average","15":"tag-realclearpolitics-average","16":"tag-reuters-ipsos-survey","17":"tag-trump-approval-rating"},"yoast_head":"\nApproval Rating Remains Net Negative<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Public Support for the Iran Strikes Is Limited<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Threat Claims and Political Criticism<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Voters Still Prioritize the Economy<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
What Surveys Showed Before the Strikes<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n